The State Election Commission has just made a decision to limit publicity of its work and prevent observes to monitor part of the work of this institution. Specifically, the SEC decided that in mini groups, that are not based in law or in the rules of this institution, to determine the factsof the cases away from the eyes of the observers.
Because the similar system was used and on the last night meeting of the SEC, we can conclude that at the session itself the facts are not determined, but rather one reporter presents for each case its own decision suggestion, and then the party votes about it.
Which is particularly absurd is the system of the SEC in which on the proposals of the Positive and DF yesterday reported quasi working group made of two representatives from DPS. What is going to be the system today, we do not know, because it is denied to us, as observers, to follow this part of the SEC’s work.
However, this kind of work methodology has never been used, nor it was suggested by the Law and Rules of the SEC.
We fear that this practice of the SEC and secret way of work based on the methodology that law does not recognize, additionally crumbles confidence in the electoral process and cast doubt on the legality of the work and decisions made by the SEC.
MANS
