{"id":1383,"date":"2011-06-10T13:04:32","date_gmt":"2011-06-10T12:04:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mans.co.me\/en\/"},"modified":"2011-06-10T13:04:32","modified_gmt":"2011-06-10T12:04:32","slug":"zib-275-178m2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/?p=1383","title":{"rendered":"ZIB-275.178m2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The data of Real Estate Administration (REA) Bar that came to be known to MANS are indicative of suspicion that ZIB, assisted by the then Head of the REA Bar Novica Vu\u010dkovi\u0107<a href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]<\/a>, has unlawfully acquired land, i.e. that there were no legal grounds for the given property to be registered to ZIB.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The case file for the disputed plot no. 1913\/2, cadastre municipality Zaljevo, Bar, does not contain any legally valid document based on which it would be possible to register the given plot to ZIB. What the case file does contain, though, is the encumbrance of restitution claims to the benefit of Smiljka Perazi\u0107 and others, as well as the encumbrance placed by \u201cMorsko dobro\u201d (Coastal Zone Management, a public company). Moreover, over the years this property was several times encumbered with mortgage as a security for ZIB to be granted loans.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/zib-parcela.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"border: 1px solid black;\" src=\"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/zib-parcela.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Location of the plot<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>How did ZIB acquire over 270,000 m<sup>2<\/sup> of land?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">By the decision of the Local Council of Bar in 1980 the disputed plot was designated as a quarry site and awarded for <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">USE<\/span><\/strong> to the then state-owned company \u201cZavod za izgradnju Bara\u201d justified by the public interest for rapid reconstruction of the Bar municipality following the disastrous earthquake in\u00a0 1979. \u00a0In addition to this, the case file also contains the decision by which ZIB was approved the construction of a quarry on the disputed plot, as well as the approval from 1981 issuing the certificate of occupancy for the quarry. Apart from these documents, the Bar cadastre office holds no other papers placing ZIB in connection with the land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As a state-owned company, in 2000 ZIB was transformed into a share-holding company with a package of shares held by the then Executive Manager, \u017darko Pavi\u0107evi\u0107. According to the data held by the Central Depositary Agency, today Pavi\u0107evi\u0107 is the majority owner of ZIB, with a stake of over 53%.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Following the ZIB privatisation, upon their request, the REA Bar, in its decision of 10 July 2002, assigned the land and the buildings found on the disputed plot from the Municipality of Bar to ZIB, without a single document pursuant to which it would be legally possible. The case file for this plot does not contain any sale agreement between the Municipality and ZIB, nor any decision of any authority to make such assignment of land from the Municipality of Bar to \u017darko Pavi\u0107evi\u0107\u2019s company lawful. There is no information as to whether Pavi\u0107evi\u0107 paid for this land and in what amount, or whether it was assigned to him free of charge and following which procedure. Such a decision simply assigning to Pavi\u0107evi\u0107 the title to over 270,000 m<strong><sup>2<\/sup><\/strong> of land was verified by the then head of the Bar Cadastre Office Novica Vu\u010dkovi\u0107.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Afterwards, ZIB continued to use the land unobstructed, but also continued building new structures on the same plot, so that today there is the total of 16 such buildings erected on the disputed plot.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Loans and mortgages on a plot \u201cfree of any encumbrances\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Between 2008 and 2011, on several occasions ZIB put the disputed land as security for procuring loans of the total value close to 2 million euro. The first mortgage was put in October 2008 to procure a 400,000 euro worth a loan. Afterwards, in May 2005 ZIB raised another loan of 250,000 euro putting as security the same land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">ZIB took the following loan with the disputed plot used again as security in December 2009, for the amount of further 350,000 euro. The last in a row, and the largest to that, was taken in December 2010 in the amount of 900,000 euro.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All the loans were extended by the Atlas banka AD Podgorica, and all the Loan and Mortgage Agreements were signed on behalf of ZIB by Danijela Krkovi\u0107, Executive Manager, and on behalf of Atlas banka, by Mihailo Banjevi\u0107, the Bank CEO.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The thing that is particularly dubious is that the company owned by the Mayor of Bar claimed in each case of concluding Mortgage Agreements that the lots bore no encumbrances or restrictions. Thus, all the pertinent agreements with Atlas banka describe the property subject to mortgage as land \u201cowned by the Mortgagor, solely an exclusively, without any encumbrances or restrictions\u201d although all pledged property had registered encumbrances. All 275.178m<strong><sup>2<\/sup><\/strong> of land and 16 buildings are encumbered with restitution claims and by claims of Morsko dobro, indicating that ZIB, through its authorised representative, gave a false statement on essential features of the property mortgaged, thus misleading the Bank representatives that they enjoy full rights of title without encumbrances or restrictions over the disputed plot of land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When concluding the Mortgage Agreement, the disputed land and buildings were evaluated by expert witness to be worth 2.8 million euro.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>275,000 m<sup>2<\/sup> of land is not enough?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In addition to the case described above, in 2004 ZIB attempted to register two more municipal plots, of total area over 5,000 m<sup>2<\/sup>, to its name. On the occasion, ZIB was rejected with the explanation they failed to accompany the given request with stipulation of legal grounds for assigning the property from the Municipality of Bar to ZIB.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<hr style=\"text-align: justify;\" size=\"1\" \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> Novica Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 is the head of the Cadastre Office in Bar who in 2002 enabled ZIB, the company owned by \u017darko Pavi\u0107evi\u0107, to register property rights to over 90,000 m<sup>2<\/sup> of land owned by the Bar-based company \u201cTehnopromet B\u201c, based on a null and void contract between the two companies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The data of Real Estate Administration (REA) Bar that came to be known to MANS are indicative of suspicion that ZIB, assisted by the then Head of the REA Bar Novica Vu\u010dkovi\u0107[1], has unlawfully acquired land, i.e. that there were no legal grounds for the given property to be registered to ZIB. The case<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a class=\"cat-83\" href=\"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/?p=1383\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1383","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-urbanization"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mans.co.me\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}